Oil vs muscle power

smoothie-bike

Matlinah Omiti (in the middle) demonstrates her "smoothie bicycle".

Kjell-Aleklett

Kjel Aleklett talking about future energy challenges.

Yesterday Tällberg Foundation arranged something they called “A Day For the Future” at Skeppsholmen, which is one of the islands in central Stockholm.
Having spent the weekend trying to suck the last sweet nectar out of this wonderful summer at Möja, another island further out in the archipelago, I arrived just in time to hear the “peak oil guru” professor Kjell Aleklett and his colleagues from Uppsala University talk about our energy future.

The theories about exactly when peak oil will happen differs, but the fact that oil is a limited resource and that we won’t have cheap and easily accessible oil forever is something that humanity will have to deal with, whether we like it or not. The question is just how.
Right now more than 80 percent of the world’s energy mix comes from fossil fuels.
Kersti Johansson, a researcher at Aleklett’s institution held a very interesting talk about the possibility to replace the fossil fuels that now are used for transportation with bio energy coming from agricultural crops or spill. Her calculations show that it will be very difficult, unless we want to grow crops for energy production instead of for food.

Not far from the museum library where the Peak Oil seminar was held I found something that makes it even more obvious what a lot of energy we use in our daily life. Matlinah Omiti from the Royal Institute of Technology showed me the “Smoothie Bike” that she has constructed. By peddalling you power a blender and mix your own delicious fruit drink. I tried it, and actually it doesn’t take a lot of sweat. By increasing the resistance you could make other things work with your muscle power, Matlinah explained to me. You can for example light up one light bulb or a wall of LED lamps, and you could grind coffe. But when it comes to boiling the water for that coffee, you will fail, because boiling water requires so much energy!

Last year the BBC actually made a very funny show on this subject, connecting the energy grid of a house where a family was living their “ordinary” life to a hall with cyclist, powering the home with excercise bikes. 78 frantically pedalling cyclists were needed in order for the father of the house to take a shower…
Maybe we should start using gym bikes a bit more efficiently?

  • http://twitter.com/swedensustblog swedensustblog

    Oil vs muscle power: the Smoothie Bike makes energy use concrete – and tasty. http://tiny.cc/zlzp7 #sustainability #peakoil #climatechange

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • http://twitter.com/StudyInSweden StudyInSweden

    A very healthy breakfast! RT @swedensustblog: The Smoothie Bike makes energy use concrete – and tasty. http://tiny.cc/zlzp7 #sustainability

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • http://twitter.com/swedense swedense

    Oil versus muscle power – http://bit.ly/cGnihc #sustainability #sweden

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • Pol – Croatia

    This idea of using gym equipement as electricity producer occured to me also several times already, morover as their displays often show the caloric or even watt output as you perform excercise (which is sometimes even confusing, not knowing what it actually means). This direct mechanical use is probably even more efficient, due to much less powerconversion loss, i guess.

    The example of not been able to boil water so easily is i think quite interesting because if i remember correctly to attain higher and higer levels of speed or temperature you need to invest exponentially more and more energy, so at some point (theoretically) one would have to have infinite amount of energy to produce some limited effect. These means that humankind will probably never have solved its energy problems, unless at some point it finaly becomes satisfied with what it has already achieved. (?)

    In that sense it is interesting to me the “Kardashev scale” criterion (there is an article on wikipedia). Interestingly, on the highest scale it states that (if i remeber correctly) the most evolved level of civilisation would be the suistainable one.

    The english / british humor can sometimes be quite amusing and indicative. I am just watching Red dwarf for instance (as a warming up for more serious ST E.). I guess, sometimes it is a best way to communicate some controversial or dificcult issues in funny way for not to become to heavy to follow and consider. …

  • Sara Jeswani

    Yes, it would be a fun idea to have a display showing how much coffee you grind or how many lamps you light up with your excercises!
    And you’re right about the direct mechanical use. Pedalling the smoothie bike I was suprised it was easier than powering the dynamo lamp I have on my bike, but the reason is just that no power goes to waste, as it otherwise does in the process of converting it into electiricty first.

    Humor is important. For some more, take a look at this clip from the BBC show I mentioned above, where the cyclists struggle to power one man’s shower.

  • Pol – Croatia

    Yes. Considering this video, it is really amasing that so much electricity is even possible to be produced in the powerplants for our convinient daily use, after all. Even if, the price is going pretty high and climbing. Some people here (especially one with low income) even avoid to turn on heating during winter and use more blankets instead. …

  • http://twitter.com/swedense swedense

    Check out this “smoothie bicycle” – http://bit.ly/cGnihc Great invention! #sustainability #sweden

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • http://www.catalyst-energy.com Natural energy

    Nice bog.I like the detailed information on natural energy.
    Thanks for sharing this information.I’ll share it with others.

  • Solo

    loooving it myself :) )
    by the way im very curious what kind of lens do u use ? ) beautiful pictures :)

  • http://twitter.com/LolaAkinmade Lola Akinmade

    @Solo – Thanks!

    For the closeup food shots, I used a 35mm f/1.8 fixed lens.

  • Solo

    i recently bought the 85mm 1.8.. :) first prime lens…a bit scary and unusual :) ,but when i see results as yours im all – I can do it… I can do it :) )

  • http://twitter.com/LolaAkinmade Lola Akinmade

    Yes you can! :) ) Just keep playing with the 85mm f/1.8 as much as you can. And let me know how you like it. The 85mm fixed is perfect for portraits and I’d love to buy one as well.

    For the other pictures, I mostly use a 16-85mm Nikkor lens.

  • Wanderluster

    Total yumminess!

  • Solo

    for sure i ll let u know :) ) next week im going to Sweden so i might as well share some Swedish experience seen tru 85mm :) )

  • Henrik

    Very nice! However, the correct spelling is “gravad lax” (two words), or “gravlax” (one word, but no “-ad”).

  • http://twitter.com/LolaAkinmade Lola Akinmade

    Tack Henrik! I’ve added the extra space :)