The Urkult festival wasn’t the only big music event this past weekend. In the old alum works area of the Christinehof Ecopark in Skåne in the south of Sweden artists filled the whole Saturday with music, in a manifestation against the planned extraction of fossil gas in Skåne.
Ever since the energy company Shell started their test drillings in three of the county’s municipalities, protests have been growing.
According to the protest network “Heaven or sHell”, drilling for gas would mean great risks for the groundwater, but also affect air quality, the landscape and its inhabitants.
Recently European statistics showed that Sweden is leading the European
league when it comes to our share of renewable energy compared to total energy consumption. This is much thanks to our big rivers providing us with hydropower enough to cover about half of the country’s electricity needs. But “to invest in fossil energy in 2010 instead of in environmentally friendly and sustainable alternatives is grave”, the anti-gas drilling network writes on its web site.
One of the big discussions about this project has circled around the choice of words. While the drilling company talks about “natural gas” and claims that this gas leads to less emissions than burning coal and oil. Activists, on their hand, underscore that the gas is still a fossil fuel, contributing to global warming, and point out that few people actually know that natural gas and fossil gas is the same thing.
Another thing largely discussed is the current mineral law in Sweden, which does not give the local municipality a veto right when it comes to gas or oil extraction, which is the case with new wind power plants or uranium extraction. This is expected to be an issue for the coming elections.
At the moment Shell is waiting for the result of the test drillings before deciding whether or not to apply for a permit to extract gas. That decision will probably be taken around the end of this year.




