Monthly archives: November 2009

Dismantling a city

future-scenarios

About seven months ago I was in London and went for a meeting about food and climate change. Well, meeting was actually a vague description for the huge church packed with people that I entered.
I was astonished that so many Londoners would spend their Friday evening discussing how to solve food problems, and I still remember thinking that “This would be difficult in Sweden”.
This last Friday evening proved me wrong. When the climate magazine Effekt, that I work with, together with the British Council and the internet community Ecoprofile arranged a seminar at the Ecoteque in Stockholm about how to grow food in a big city, more than 120 persons showed up.

London as an example

Two British guests – Rosie Boycott from the London Food Board and Seb Mayfield from the project Capital growth – talked about how they work to make London’s food system more sustainable and healthy, and how they help people start growing vegetables in allotments, but also in all the small forgotten spaces around our houses: balconies, windowsills and courtyards.
I felt very inspired, and hopefully I’ll start growing a little something outside my house as soon as spring comes…

Future scenarios

In the meantime an exhibition at the Ecoteque can serve as inspiration. There Urbavista – a future scenario machine has a webcam pointed at Stockholm’s main square outside the window, and shows what it could look like in the future.
Parameters such as “consumption”, “recycling”, “economic development” and “power and ownership” can be changed – and the picture of the square changes with it. From a place covered with adverts, to a green oasis with vegetable gardens everywhere. It’s all up to us.
Above it all a CO2 meter hangs as a judge: would this scenario be a sustainable one from a climate point of view?

A complicated machine

At Urbavista’s home page you can see some more photos.
This is how this amazing machine’s creators explain their idea behind it: ”If we could dismantle a city the way we dismantle a motor, and put all the pieces in front of us at the ground, we would be surprised at how many flexible parts it contains. Apart from the inhabitants and their relations we would find a variety of other complex systems. – - – Leaving the physical that we can see and touch there are a number of other elements that influence how the city looks. How much energy we use, how food, energy and goods are produced, and so on. All these systems make cities the most complicated machines we ever constructed.”

Who defines what’s environmentally friendly?

west-sweden
West Sweden, just slightly greener than what I see from my train window. Photo: Ylva S/Flickr.

Today I’m on the train, somewhere between Gothenburg and Stockholm, in the region West Sweden. The landscape outside turning slightly grayish, but still: this is one of the most beautiful stretches of road (or rather of rail, I suppose) that I know.
I am on my way back after talking to a group of students about the climate top meeting in Copenhagen and about climate journalism. It’s always very interesting to hear what others have to say in these issues.
One of the things we brought up is where our ideas about what is “environment friendly” actually come from. Earlier I have written on this blog about how we often label what people do according to their social status.
Again: All steps are important, but it is essential to see that all steps are not equally big.

From a new angle

Recently I read a paper from Lund University which looks at this from yet another angle. Before, it argues, it used to be environmental organizations that defined what was counted as environmental consciousness. With climate change – fortunately – having become an interest for a larger part of society, there are now many more wanting to shape this conception.
According to Mikael Lahti and Jörgen Gotthardsson, who have written the paper, the “new” definition has more and more come to embrace things that do not threaten our current lifestyle too much.
One of their examples is how companies wanting to sell new cars depict themselves as environmental warriors and market their cars as “environmental friendly”, when a more accurate wording for it would be “harming the environment slightly less”. And what happened to cycles and public transport?

Radio for global thinking

Think-Globally-Radio
Radio hosts Jimmy Yoler and Eric Paglia. Photo: Think Globally Radio.

Sunday evenings are show evenings for Think Globally Radio, a radio program broadcasted from Stockholm, in English. The idea behind it is, as they put it themselves, to “help spread awareness and deeper understanding on issues of the environment and sustainable development”. Each episode focuses on an important environmental issue, which can be anything from sustainable fishery to political perspectives at the climate summit in Copenhagen.
Guests from academia, industry, the policy making sector, advocacy organizations, the scientific community, state authorities, and research institutes are invited to give their views on the subject.
All the programs are also available on the web. Listen to it on thinkgloballyradio.org.

Humanity on trial

humanity-on-trial
Tushar Daring and Sultana Begun from Bangladesh speak about the hardships of climate change. Photo: Stefan Ljung.

Imagine it is the year 2020. We are sitting in a court room, looking back at what happened eleven years ago, when the world community gathered at the 2009 UN Climate Change summit in Copenhagen.
That was a time when we had the opportunity to do something about climate change. But did we?

This is the scenario which was built up in the beginning of this week at the Swedish Forum for Human Rights held here in Stockholm. In a fictitious trial, held by future generations, real eye-witnesses of today are called to tell about their experiences of climate change. Now, in the year of 2009. And these experiences are far from fictitious.

Houses falling into the sea

Among them was Sheila Watt Cloutier, Inuit from the north of Canada. She told the audience how a warmer climate has already been palpable for a long time. How winters become shorter, how the permafrost melts and coasts erode, making the inhabitants’ houses fall down into the sea.
From Cambodia came Peuvchenda Bun, who testified about children’s rights being violated because of climate change when floods make it impossible to go to school and droughts make children starve.
Before us the jury, led by the former general secretary of Amnesty International’s Swedish branch, Carl Söderbergh. And the verdict? Will anyone of us walk free? 

Events like this make it evident that no one will be able to say “we didn’t know” when we in the future are asked why not enough was done. 

Here you can see a short interview with Sheila Watt Cloutier where she defends “the right to be cold”.

 

Doing it together. Laundry the Swedish way

laundry-room
A typical Swedish laundry room. Photo: Roland Johansson HSB.

Washing clothes is a serious subject in Sweden. Everyone who has ever lived in a Swedish flat with a communal laundry room knows that. Taking somebody else’s washing time or forgetting to clean the tumble dryer’s lint filter are major sins, and many conflicts have arisen around these terrible violations. But communal laundry rooms also have great benefits, not least environmentally.

50 000 tons of detergent

The museum Nordiska museet here in Stockholm recently opened an exhibition about laundry rooms. Wandering around between the washing machines at the museum I realized this is quite an exotic phenomenon globally. In Sweden about 40 percent of the population lives in apartment buildings. Most of these buildings have a communal laundry room.
In many aspects it is a good way of economizing with resources. Fewer machines are needed, people concentrate their laundry work and fill the machines better. But our washing is still affecting the environment. Of the 50 0000 tons of detergent used every year, one fourth is actually overdoses! The emission of phosphorous from washing powders and detergents contribute to the eutrophication of the Baltic Sea, feeding the algal bloom.
Another thing is washing too often. According to this exhibition only 7 percent of the clothes we throw into the washing machines are actually dirty.

Artistic Inspiration

But there are also funny sides of communal laundry rooms. This exhibition contains a big collection of angry notes pinned up by furious neighbours.

Or why not see this place as an artistic inspiration? Below one of the Youtube films shown at the museum.